A S&W 940 is a stainless five shot Centennial style (internal hammer) J-frame orginally chambered in 9mm. In a thread on the 1911Forum I mentioned I had two converted to 9x23 by Dane. It is a service he has never advertised, but about two years ago I noticed a 940 Performance Center (the stainless steel is blackened BTW) sitting next to a 9x23 1911 he had posed in one of his gallery photos and the light bulb came on.
Burns Custom Pistols Colt 1991A1 and S&W 940PC both chambered in 9x23
I thought WOW, a J-frame in 9x23 would be the perfect companion for the fullhouse 1911 in 9x23 I had just commissioned. So, asked Dane about the possibility of having a 9x23 J-frame. He then told me that was in fact what I was looking at. He agreed to do the conversion work for me, so I then proceeded to hunt down two 940s and send them off to Dane's shop.
The 940 was a 9mm version of the 640 that was built for the .357 Magnum. I have never much cared for 2" .357s, but the 9x23 in the same gun works better. Less noise and muzzle flash. If my unproven pet theory is correct, then we are seeing more muzzle velocity from the same 124/125gr. bullets from 9x23 brass in a 2" revo. The idea being the shorter brass holds faster burning powder, that burns more completely in a short tube than do loads for .357 Magnum, which normally need at least 4" of tube to burn all their powder. I have observed less flash and kick with the 940 in 9x23 then I did with my old 640 shooting 125s. The chrono work need to be done to confirm my theory.
If I am right, then this is the most useable power to be had in a J-frame package. All that aside, my primary motivation was ammo compatability between my primary and back-up guns. I think this makes a great combo. BTW, the same 940 can shoot 9mm, 9mm Largo, .356 TSW and .38 Super, which opens up some other options as well. It uses moonclips BTW.
DD
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Desert Dog on 2001-04-10 11:03 ]</font>