I have sitting here thinking that much of the improvements on the carry guns we have, have been the result of race gun technology. The many of the refinements in sights, reliability, accuracy, comfort and durability have been put to the test on IPSC raceguns and what has worked has stayed and what was junk castaway.
A lot of the smiths today have the benefit of a couple of decades of the race gun test bed. Many of the early shops that built guns for carry were able to refine their craft in competition circles as thousands of rounds went downrange to prove what would last in hard use.
Anyway, does anyone else think this or am I standing out here in left field looking for UFOs. :smile:
I was just sitting here looking at my carry gun, thinking it was better for knowing my racegun.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: eerw on 2001-06-05 18:26 ]</font>
A lot of the smiths today have the benefit of a couple of decades of the race gun test bed. Many of the early shops that built guns for carry were able to refine their craft in competition circles as thousands of rounds went downrange to prove what would last in hard use.
Anyway, does anyone else think this or am I standing out here in left field looking for UFOs. :smile:
I was just sitting here looking at my carry gun, thinking it was better for knowing my racegun.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: eerw on 2001-06-05 18:26 ]</font>