How many of you will refuse to make certain modifications to a pistol because even though they would be mechanically safe, they would be risky from a civil liability standpoint?
Example: Suppose that you know how to put a safe, consistent two pound trigger pull on a 1911. Would you put such a trigger on a customer's defense gun if he requested it, or would you refuse to avoid being sued for a shooting involving a "hair trigger"?
Would if make any difference if you knew that the customer was, say, a top-ranked IPSC shooter who fires 10,000+ rounds a year using a pound and a half trigger?
Example: Suppose that you know how to put a safe, consistent two pound trigger pull on a 1911. Would you put such a trigger on a customer's defense gun if he requested it, or would you refuse to avoid being sued for a shooting involving a "hair trigger"?
Would if make any difference if you knew that the customer was, say, a top-ranked IPSC shooter who fires 10,000+ rounds a year using a pound and a half trigger?