Pistol Smith Forum banner

1 - 20 of 21 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
693 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
How does the quality of the alloy compare to modern alloy? Wasn't the 50's a really good era for Colt? Pros and cons?

I'm putting it here because of my question on alloy frame may best be answered by gunsmith.

Thanks.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
191 Posts
Rumors are just that. LW Commanders are great carry guns. They are as tough as any aluminum lower end gun from the 50's when they were concieved until the present time I have seen many cracked Colt frames and we used to drill a 1/16th inch hole in them to stop the crack travel. I have a friend who has carried one of my vintage ( 1954)since Korean days. It looks terrible and shoots great. I almost like that light purple lower end and the light gray patina on the slide. I think the metal these were made of is better than what they use today but have no basis for that thinking. I am sure I am on worng on that count. If I were building any lightweight lower end 1911 I would use a ramped barrel and Accu-Rails. That way I know it would shoot forever. Some people put a metal feed ramp in but I think that is silly. Why bother, I guess , when you can solve the problem my way. Any of the lightweight 1911's that are produced now would be of no use to me. I don't care for them and don't find them fun to work on. That's why Baskin Robbins makes 31 flavors. I am usually wrong, according to the other forum. So use your own judgement and spend your money like you want. Mine is too hard to come by to throw it away on guns I don't believe are worth the money. Bob Brown knows about carry Commanders.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,371 Posts
Hello. Certainly, this is from limited first-hand experience, but a fine gentleman who was like a grandfather to me owned a couple of early '50s Commanders. They were stock. He carried them with ball ammo when I shot them in the early '80s. Not surprisingly, the pistols worked flawlessly and the sights, though small, were "on." Later, he sold me two LW Commanders, but not those, and I had both slightly customized to include high-visibility fixed sights, and a few other things. I tested both and have shot the fire out of one while the spare rests in the safe. I suspect I'd better shoot the spare, too, as the original just continues to shoot and shoot and shoot.

Most know that I'm a confirmed Browning HP nut, but for a most easy to tote and quick to use pistol of decent power, I find the Commander very hard to beat.

In fact, I'm not sure it can be done.

Best.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
157 Posts
I have carried some form of LW Commander since I started my law enforcement career in 1981. The only concern I would have with a 50's LW would be with the slide, not the frame. Not because the steel was better or worse, but because the slides had a series of lightening cuts, and they have a tendency to crack. Remember Cooper's addage of a gun to shoot a little, carry a lot. The LW is a .45 that I would use a Shok Buff in, and change the recoil spring frequently.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
693 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
Since Boothman brought it to my attention, are there disadvantages (problems) associated with the early LW Commander skeletonized slides? Did Colt change this because of cracking problems or cost issues? The gun would be a carry gun and not shot much.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
191 Posts
Colt quit doing the light weight slides because it cost money to machine them, not because there was a problem with them. I have never had a cracked LW slide come my way, but all parts fail. Some fail sooner than others. Colt also has never cared what it's customers want or need. They have the Great American Corporate Arrogance that has kept them on the verge of bankrupcy for most of my lifetime. I have no use for them or their products. They could have made a ton of money by selling their parts when Cooper started the 1911 craze, but they wouldn't. They do not answer their phone, and do not return their calls.They deserve to go broke.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
194 Posts
We gunfolks are a strange community. As a group we are as bad as the society we come from about seeking superlatives. It's like the ongoing quibbling about Ruger Redhawks and Blackhawks vs S&W 29's and the Ruger 357's vs anyone elses: who cares? They both seem to blow at so close to the same psi that it all seems moot. Might matter if I shot silhouette as a MAJOR competitor, but I don't--and if I did I'd choose a Freedom Arms SA anyway. Since I don't, I prefer the smaller size, the greater grace, the better balance and handling, and the better fitting of my early 29's (without even--horror of horrors--having the vaunted "endurance" packet).

At least two writers over the years have run several 5-10K round endurance tests on the Commanders and found that they basically kept functioning despite minor problems that were easily fixed. The drilling of a hole to stop an incipient crack has already been pointed out. Think I'll dig those out of the reference files one of these days.

Consumers jumped on the steel framed Commanders (perhaps because the Gunshop Codos leaped on the catchy COMBAT appelation), but I've always suspected that was because the 26-ounce Commanders kicked too much for the would be shootists whereas the couple of ounces difference beween the long and short steel jobs were so immaterial as to make any thinking person wonder why anyone would give up the extra sighting radius and velocity and the slight bit of extra muzzle weight at just the right point.

The Colt Commanders have endured for right on half a century and work for what they are intended. Alloy frame pieces were made to CARRY, not to serve as match guns. I surely don't know metallury well enough to pontificate about metallury then and now---and suspect few do with the specifics of the Commander alloy at any specific point in time. All I know is that my own last pair date to the early seventies, have never had anything lighter than GI ball run through them, and neither gun has presented any problem over the years.

Hell, even old Skeeter Skelton with his love of the 5 inch 27 and 44 SAA's was partial to his brace of Commanders when things really got tense. Now, how could anyone wish for more proof of the Commander's excellance, durability, and reliability than that old revolver man's sanction?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
849 Posts
256, Now THAT was very well said indeed!
I have three lightweight Commanders, all 70's series, and have never had an ounce of trouble with any of them! (ounce of trouble, no pun intended). :grin:
I remember the article from Shooting Times where Skeeter did the 5,000 round torture test with a lightweight Commander, and a Gold Cup. Neither gun failed in any way, and they were both stock from Colt.
Lou
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
194 Posts
Thanks, Lou. Appreciate the kind words. I thought Skelton did one of the articles and I think that old fraud Nonte did the other. In any event, both tests were pretty abusive and while I might doubt Nonte's conclusion (under any of his several pseudonyms), I'd take Skeeter's word as gospel. I need to dig those pieces out of my files.

People are funny about Commanders. They don't get a lot of publicity and yet folks keep dropping the term that they are "the professional's gun." That being said, I've never known a lot of folks who carried them. Of course, they've been around since the early 50's so they don't have the shine of brand, spankin' new offerings. I think I've seen more steel frame Combat Commanders than Commanders and, of course, for younger folks, the Commander seems to be ignored for the Officer's ACP's.

Personally, I think the Commanders are easier to conceal than say, an all steel Officer's ACP. The Commander distributes the weight better. Don't have a problem with the grip size and I'd rather have the extra rounds than the short grip. I surely feel that Commanders are much more reliable than the shorter guns---and even Commanders have had a reputation for being a bit less reliable than the full size guns. (That has NOT been my experience, however, though I do like a long ejector in the short guns).

I really do wish folks would make an effort to distinguish between THE COMMANDER which is an alloy framed weapon and the Combat Commander which is the all steel gun (less a few of the omnipresent plastic parts, of course).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
191 Posts
256-ms has made some really good points. The Combat Commander is a different gun and I would rather carry a government model that one of those. Until I aquired the LW Commander I packed a GM for many ,many ,years. As a Law Dawg and a civilian I have packed a 1911 on my right hip for almost 50 years.I like the LW the best. I have never had a problem with concealing any 1911 and most of the time I just stuck it in my pants behind my back. We use to use a piece of string and make a Mexican Carry rig that worked great. It is important that those of you who can, carry a weapon on your person when you are out and about. That is, if you call yourself an American. If you are a socialist slave ,then you are required to be a victim. Armed men are citizens, unarmed men are slaves. My family has kept and born arms for 900 years and I am not going to quit now. I like to maintain the illusion of Freedom even though I know that we are not a free country and haven't been for many years. Congress just voted out the 1st Ammendemnt and the 2nd has been gone since I was born. America the Beautiful? RIP
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
20 Posts
Just a question please? Whats your problem with Nonte? I never noticed anything wrong with his articles(does'nt mean there is'nt just I never saw it) And gunsmith Austin Behlert spoke highly of both him and his knowlwdge of fireams and how they work. Just wondering about your opinion and why No flame intended or implied.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: DEAF SMITH on 2002-05-17 12:45 ]</font>
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
25 Posts
I'm not familiar w/a Commander, isn't that a full size frame with a slightly shorter barrel/slide?

A question for those who find smaller 1911s easier to carry. Is it the weight, or the length which makes it easier?

I ask because I carry a steel GM, and it conceals better than a glock, SIG, HK etc. because it's thin. With a good IWB on a good belt, I wear it 12+ hours a day.

What's the attraction of a smaller pistol? it's still almost as heavy isnt' it? I don't see how it conceals better (unless you have a very short torso), and you give up shootability and sight radius...

I'm not trying to flame, I'm just trying to udnerstand, maybe I don't get it. I could see a LW gun if you wanted to save a few ozs. but again, you lose shootability...

Maybe I'm just lucky that I'm fairly tall and slender (getting less slender every year however) and I'm spoiled by Lou's amazing sharkskin belt and a great Sparks VM2 holster, but I find my LB TRS sits on my hip under a t-shirt or polo shirt, and no one is ever the wiser...

is gun length an issue for some?

Regards,
Francis
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
191 Posts
Well, Francis. The car in my driveway is Old Number 16. It is a Caddie with leather seats. My Commander does not poke them with it's nose like a GM does. The previous 15 Caddies also had leather seats. Commanders have other nice attributes. They cycle very quickly and you can put two of the best in a bad guys's chest with ease. They are more comfortable for old farts like me to have on a beat up hip it seems. They have a long enough slide so they can be made dependable and they are almost as accurate as a GM. They also have the same mag capacity as the bigger boys do and fit a manly size hand well. I use to do El Presidente's in about 4 seconds with my Commander that Bill Bidwell built and carried it every day for many years. I do prefer a GM for most things, but I carry every day and like the feel of that old 1954 Lightweight Commander with that good old 1954 GI Ball ammo stuffed in it. I guess the important thing is to carry what you like and like what you carry. Just don't go to a gunfight without a gun!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
25 Posts
Hey Dave,

thanks for the info! Sounds like you've got a system that works well. I'm fortunate that I don't have a problem sitting in my car with my GM.

of course it's not perfect, but it's worlds better than sitting on my Glock19...

Next time I'm at the gunstore, I'll have to check out a Commander.

thanks!
Francis
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1 Posts
LW Commander

Hello, this is my first post...I have a 1954(I called Colt) vintage Commander that is in extremely bad shape cosmetically and functionally too. The gun was left in a leather holster and was submerged in water and left to rot(NOT BY ME!). I want to restore this gun to its original condition with functional upgrades. I really need suggestions and places to get parts. Colt told me they wouldn't even work on it because it is so old. What do I do? Thanks. James.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,420 Posts
...well Geez, send that old wore out sucker to ME of course!
I wouldn't want you to be seen with an old, left-to-rot piece like THAT!
It'd fit me just right as I look a lot like you describe that Commander!
Old, wore-out and left-to-rot! ;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
32 Posts
Re: LW Commander

alexjam said:
Hello, this is my first post...I have a 1954(I called Colt) vintage Commander that is in extremely bad shape cosmetically and functionally too. The gun was left in a leather holster and was submerged in water and left to rot(NOT BY ME!). I want to restore this gun to its original condition with functional upgrades. I really need suggestions and places to get parts. Colt told me they wouldn't even work on it because it is so old. What do I do? Thanks. James.
You need to take it to a qulified Smith who will assess what needs to be done by looking at it, give you a price and then do the work if it's practical.

You can pick up Commanders (usually called Lightweight Commanders) in a pre-70 or 70 series for around $600.00 in near new condition....So let then be your guide. That means yours may cost more to repair than to replace.

PigPen
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
32 Posts
Just for conversation, I weighed several of my 1911s. Here's what I confirmed:

70 Series Colt (Lwt) Commander: Pistol has been modified with Barstow Barrel, bushing and an aluminum leightweight trigger. Otherwise stock.

Empty weight: 26.375 oz.
King stainless mag with pad: 2.50 oz.
Eight (8 ) Black talon 45 ACP cartridges 6 oz.
Total weight loaded 34.875 oz.

Custom Caspian Combat Commander size 1911:

Empty Weight 34.50 oz.
King stainless mag with pad: 2.50 oz.
Eight (8 ) Black talon 45 ACP cartridges 6 oz.
Total weight loaded 43 oz.

Custom Caspian Stainless Steel Commander sized 1911:

Empty Weight 35.50 oz.
King stainless mag with pad: 2.50 oz.
Eight (8 ) Black talon 45 ACP cartridges 6 oz.
Total weight loaded 44 oz.

70 Series Colt GC Mark IV Bone stock except for Ivory grips:

Empty Weight 37.625 oz.
King stainless mag with pad: 2.50 oz.
Eight (8 ) Black talon 45 ACP cartridges 6 oz.
Total weight loaded 46.375 oz.




  • * The loaded (Lwt) Commander weighs 11.5 oz. (24.8%) less than the Full sized Colt GC.

    * The loaded Custom Caspian Combat Commander size 1911 weighs 3.375 oz. (7.3%) less than the Full sized Colt GC.

    * Custom Caspian Stainless Steel Commander sized 1911 weighs 2.375 oz. (5.1 %) less than the full sized Colt GC.


Now while, a 11.5 oz (24.8%) reduction in the case of the (Lwt) Commander may justify the reduction in benefits afforded by the longer GM, I question why I own the other two which offer little weight reduction at all when you condiered loaded weight!

PigPen
 
1 - 20 of 21 Posts
Top