On 2001-04-12 23:54, David DiFabio wrote:
This is a question that I have asked more than once and I am very curious to hear your choices, likes, dislikes, experiences etcetera.
My main "dislike" is that manufacturers tend to change components at will, which can drastically effect the termial performance of the load. I recently tested in meat a popular 115 gr. +P+ load that some people have reported as quite effective but the lot that I have blew up (it was provided directly from the manufacture for LEO testing) and no part of it penetrated more than 5", about the same as a Glaser Safety Slug - totally inadequate for all but a face on hit to say the sternum. I try to keep up on the current ammo but it is almost impossible (there are at least 5 and I beleive there are as many as 7 versions of .45 230 Federal Hydra-Shok).
With that, duty loads (as opposed to hunting loads) subject to change:
.460 Rowland - Triton Hi-vel (I have not yet considered this a real "duty" cart.)
.45 Super - Triton Hi-Vel (now discontinued)
.45 ACP +P - Win. Ranger SXT (black Talon) 230, Triton +P Hi-Vel
.45 ACP - Fed. 230 H.S., Triton 230 or 200 Hi-vel, Wilson 200 XTP, Hornaday 230 or 200 XTP.
.44 Mag. - Win. 210 Silver-Tip, Triton 165 Mag-Lite,
.44 Spl - Speer Blazer (I know :sad

200 Gold Dot, (testing Triton)
.41 Mag - Win 175 Silver-Tip
10mm - Win. 175 Silver-Tip
.40 S&W - Triton 155 Hi-vel, Speer 165 G.D., Rem 165 G.S.
9X23 - Win. USA 125 jsp, Handload 147
[email protected] fps.
.357 Mag - Win. 145 Silver-Tip, Fed. 158 H.S., Fed. 130 P.D., Speer 125 G.D., Triton 125 G.D. (testing Fed. 140 Classic for adoption)
.38 spl - handload 145 Win S.T. loaded to 1100 fps from 2" rev.
9mm - Triton 135 +P Hi-vel, 135 Fed. H.S., Win +P+ 127 Ranger Talon, Federal 147 "Classic" jhp.
.380... just kidding :smile: (after 4 acquaintences used, or had one used on them, with disastours results - and no succeses - I gave mine away).
Food for thought,
Jim H.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Jim Higginbotham on 2001-04-13 14:22 ]</font>