glazer1972, sorry for the delayed response.
A good description of the MIM process is provided on the folowing link
http://www.flomet.com/.
My reasons for replacing the MIM parts are largely due to simple personal preferences. Addtionally, I have personal knowledge of one hammer cracking on a Kimber.
The main reason I want steel in my gun is because it is specifically for carry use. I have absolute intent the gun should not experience parts failure due to material properties under normal use.
I have replaced the hammer, sear, disconnector, and hammer strut with the BCP parts. The MSH was replaced with the Wilson component. I will probably use Wilson, or equivalent quality parts, for the firing pin, FP stop, grip safety, etc.
I believe MIM is great for many applications. I believe MIM, CNC, EDM technologies all contribute to providing a really nice product at lesser costs.
However, for a carry weapon I prefer, and will pay the difference for, steel parts.
Sorry for getting so 'wordy' here. If I've offended anyone, please accept my apologies.
Thanks,
Tom
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: tblackley on 2001-12-27 11:04 ]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: tblackley on 2001-12-27 11:05 ]</font>